SPEAKER_00 0:00

A few months ago, I was in a meeting with a supplier, a big one, a name you would recognize, and about 10 minutes in, their account executive looked at me and said, I just want to understand what procurement actually needs here. And I remember thinking that might be the most honest thing a supplier has ever said to me in a meeting. Not because suppliers are dishonest, most of them are not, but because the typical sales call follows a script, quite literally. There's a discovery phase, a demo phase, a pricing phase, and then the close. And somewhere in that choreography, the actual question of what procurement needs, not what the end user wants, not what the budget holder approved, but what the procurement function needs to feel confident about saying yes, that question almost never gets asked. This particular accounting exec broke the pattern. And what happened next was one of the most productive supplier conversations I've had in years. We talked about risk allocation. We talked about contract flexibility. We talked about what success would look like 12 months in, not just at the point of signature. And by the end of that meeting, I remember thinking, if every supplier conversation started this way, my job would be fundamentally different. Because here's the thing almost everyone I work with, the suppliers that are pitching me, the executives asking me why something takes so long, legal redlining contracts at 11 o'clock at night, the IT group that just wants their software turned on. They all interact with procurement constantly. But very few of them have any idea what's actually happening on my side of the table. And that's not a criticism. Why would they? Nobody teaches this in business school. There's no working with your CPO one-on-one. The procurement function is one of, if not the, most connected seats in any organization, and yet it might also be the least understood. I've been in rooms where C-suite executive described procurement as the team that processes purchase orders. I've been in rooms where the supplier told me with a straight face that they usually just work directly with the business. As if procurement were some sort of speed bump that they could just drive around. And I've sat across from brilliant, talented people, people who are exceptional at what they do, who genuinely have no idea why I'm asking the questions I'm asking. So that's why I'm making this show. My name is Robert Brundle, and I am the head of procurement at a major national nonprofit. I lead an amazing team that handles strategic sourcing, contracts, facilities, travel, warehousing and logistics, and even commercial risk management. And every day I sit at the intersection of nearly every function in the organization finance, legal, IT, development, advocacy, operations, you name it, trying to make sure that the money this organization spends actually serves the mission it exists to fulfill. Before this role, I spent years building procurement functions in the US, in China, and in Argentina. Negotiating high value contracts and learning, sometimes the hard way, what happens when organizations treat procurement as an afterthought. I've seen what it looks like when procurement is brought in too late, when contracts are signed without proper review, when supplier relationships collapse because nobody sets expectations up front. And I've also seen what's possible when procurement is genuinely empowered, when the function is treated as a strategic partner rather than a processing center. This show is called The Other Side of the Table, and it's not a procurement podcast, not really. It's a business show, told from the most connected seat in the organization. And it's for everyone who's ever sat across the table from procurement and wondered, what is going on over there? Let me tell you what a CPO actually does, because I think most people have it wrong. If you asked most business leaders what procurement does, they'd say something like, You buy stuff, you negotiate contracts, you try to save us money. And that's not wrong, but it's like saying a CFO counts money. It's technically true and fundamentally missing the point. What I actually do is manage how the organization makes commitments. Every contract is a commitment, every supplier relationship is a commitment, every purchase order, every lease, every software subscription, every consulting agreement, these are all promises the organization is making with its resources. And in a nonprofit, those resources belong to donors, to constituents, to people we serve. The stakes are not theoretical. Let me put it in concrete terms. When a program team comes to me and says they need a new technology platform, I'm not just comparing prices on a spreadsheet. I'm asking, does this supplier have the financial stability to be here in three years? What happens to our data if the relationship ends? Are the implementation timelines realistic? Or is the supplier telling us what we want to hear just to close the deal? What does the total cost of ownership look like? Not the license fee, but the training, the integration, the ongoing maintenance, transition costs, even end of life. The opportunity cost of choosing this over something else? Those aren't procurement questions, those are business questions. And procurement is often the only function asking them all at the same time. So when I slow something down, and yes, I do slow things down or even kill them, it's not because I enjoy bureaucracy. It's because I'm asking, is this the right commitment? Have we thought about what we're actually agreeing to? Is there commercial risk here that nobody's accounted for? Is there a better way to structure this that gets you what you need while protecting the organization? That's my job. And it puts me in a very unique position because I see patterns that nobody else in the organization sees. I see which suppliers deliver and which ones overpromise. I see which suppliers may soon go out of business before anyone else in the organization knows. I see where the organization wastes money. And not through malice, but through inertia. I see the contracts that auto-renew because nobody remembered to review them. I see a stakeholder who writes requirements so narrow that only their preferred supplier could possibly win. I see the account executive who builds genuine trust and the ones who are just running a playbook. I see the consulting firm that bills for senior partners during the pitch and then staffs the project with analysts fresh out of school. I see the software supplier that buries a 40% price escalation in year three because they know you'll be too locked in to walk away at that point. I see the internal champion who's emotionally invested in a particular solution that they've stopped evaluating it objectively. And I see the quiet, competent supplier who's been delivering excellent work for five years and has never once been recognized. Because they don't have a flashy sales team. I see all of it. And most of the time, the people on the other side of the table don't realize how much I see. That's not a power play, that's a structural reality. Procurement sits at the crossroads, and because of that, I have a perspective of how the whole business works that I think is genuinely useful to people who've never sat in this chair. Let me give you a taste of what I mean. And I want to speak directly to some specific people here because this show isn't just for procurement people. In fact, it's mostly not for procurement people. If you're a CEO or COO, you probably think of procurement as a cost center. Something that exists to process purchases and maybe negotiate a discount here and there. But what if I told you that your procurement team is one of the best early warning systems your organization has? We see supplier financial instability before it hits the news. We see scope creep forming before it even becomes budget overrun. We see contract terms that could expose you to risk that your legal team hasn't flagged because they're reviewing the contract 18 months ago and nobody has looked at it since. What if I told you that your procurement organization has a ROI of three plus times? What it costs to have it in your organization. I had a situation last year where a supplier we relied on for critical service started missing SLA targets, not dramatically, but just enough to notice if you were paying attention. Nobody in the program raised it. But because procurement tracks supplier performance systematically, we flagged it early, initiated a conversation, and ultimately renegotiated terms that included performance guarantees and an exit ramp. Six months later, that supplier went through a major restructuring. If we hadn't caught it early, we would have been scrambling. If you actually empower your CPO, give them a seat at the table, involve them before decisions were made instead of after, you'd be shocked at the value that comes back. If you're a supplier, an account executive or sales leader, listen to me carefully. The way most of you sell to procurement is upside down. You come in with a full deck of features and a discount that expires at the end of the quarter or even at the end of the month. And I promise you, the CPO on the other side of that call has seen that exact play from six other suppliers just this month. We know the playbook, we know what quarter end pressure looks like, we even know when your quarter actually ends. And when you lead with urgency and set a value, you're actually making it harder for me to champion your solution internally. What moves the needle isn't your product demo. It's your ability to show me that you understand my organization's problem, that you've done your homework, and that you're prepared to partner with me through a process that protects both of us. The suppliers I remember, the ones that I go back to, the ones I advocate for internally, are the ones who treated the procurement process as an opportunity to build trust, not an obstacle to go around. I'll tell you something else. The fastest way to lose credibility with the procurement leader is to go around them. If you're building a relationship with the business stakeholder and deliberately cutting procurement out of the conversation, I will find out. And when I do, the trust deficit you've created is going to make the rest of the process significantly harder for everyone, including your champion inside the organization. If you're in legal, in IT, development, or sales, finance, and HR, you're a functional partner. And the best thing I can tell you is this procurement is not your adversary. We're not here to slow you down. We're not here simply to cut costs. Those who work with us know that we're here to help you get what you need in a way that doesn't leave the organization exposed. But that only works if we're in the conversation early. When you bring me a signed statement of work and ask me to, quote, just process it, you've already cut me out of the part where I add the most value. You've committed the organization to terms I haven't reviewed, pricing I haven't benchmarked, and risk I haven't assessed. And now I'm in an uncomfortable position of either rubber stamping something I'm not comfortable with, or being the person who slows down, maybe even reverses, a deal that everyone thinks was already done. Nobody wins in that scenario. Bring me in when you're figuring out what you need to buy, and I will help you get there faster and better than you ever expected. I have the connected dots within the organization to make it happen quickly. I know which suppliers have performed well in adjacent areas. I know which suppliers have capabilities to fulfill your needs that we're already working with. I know which suppliers have performed, I know the pricing benchmarks look like, I know where the contractual landmines are. That knowledge is the most valuable at the beginning of a project, not at the end. And if you're actually in procurement, whether you're a buyer, a sourcing analyst, a contracts manager, or leading procurement like me, this show is for you too. Because I think we need to talk more honestly about the real work. Not the frameworks and certifications and the process maps or transformation efforts. Those matter, but they're not the hard part. The hard part is the politics, the influence, the moments where you have to tell a senior leader something they don't want to hear. The negotiations where you're balancing organizational risk against a relationship you need to maintain. The engagements you need to slow down or even kill to protect the organization. It's the moment when a VP calls you directly and says, I need this contract signed by Friday. And you know, you know, that there are terms in that agreement that the organization should not accept. And you have to figure out how to push back without burning a relationship, how to protect the organization without being seen as an obstacle, and how to both be a safeguard and a facilitator at the same time. That's the craft. And I don't hear enough people talking about it out loud, do you? So here's what I want you to take away from this first episode. If you're a CEO, a CFO, a CMO, a CTO, a COO, ask yourself, when was the last time that your CPO had a seat at a strategic conversation before the decision was actually made? Not to approve a purchase order, but to shape the approach. If the answer is I can't remember, you're leaving value on the table. Your CPO sees connections across the organization that no one else does. They understand the supplier landscape, the risk profile, the spending patterns, in a way that can inform strategy as a competitive advantage. If you let them. Start there. And you'll stand out from 90% of your competition. I'm not exaggerating. If you're a functional partner, find your procurement lead and ask them, What's the earliest point I should bring you into a project? The answer might surprise you. And it will save you time in the long run, I promise you. The five minutes you spend looping in procurement early will save you five weeks of back and forth later. And if you're in procurement, keep going. The work you do matters more than most people realize. And this show is going to help them realize it. That's the first episode of The Other Side of the Table. I'm your host, Robert Brindle. If something I said today resonated with you, if you've ever been on the other side of a procurement conversation and thought, why is this so complicated? This show is going to answer that question. And if you're in procurement and you've ever wished the rest of the organization understood what you do and why you do it, stick around. We're going to give them a view from this side of the table. Next week, we're going to talk about why I said no to your proposal. And it's not the reason you think. I'll see you then.